Dan: changes since previous CR

Dan: suggest we close and give a positive review based on these 5 items .. I don't see any issues here.

Hadley: 3 of them are editorial. 5th one is renaming a session to "enhanced"

Dan: on 2.5.8 I don't see anything worrying ..

Hadley: only one that seems consequential is the parsing... Says "This criterion was originally adopted to address problems that Assistive Technology had directly parsing HTML. Assistive Technology no longer has any need to directly parse HTML and, consequently, these problems no longer exists." I presume that is the case...

Dan: this is in their wheelhouse...

Hadley: slightly architectural... But I think it's fine.

Lea: nothing seems worrying to me.

Hi @michael-n-cooper - thanks again for bringing this to our attention as part of wide review.  We've reviewed and we're happy to see this go forward.   Can you clarify regarding the parsing issue (4.1.1) - just for our benefit so we understand why AT is no longer parsing HTML? Are you confident that there aren't any remaining edge cases where that would still be needed?

Dan: comment left let's close at the plenary.

Lea: can we rubberstamp.

Rossen: no substantive changes.

Dan: AT parsing removed https://www.w3.org/TR/2023/CR-WCAG22-20230124/#parsing

Rossen: this is good news.

Peter: data comes directly from

Yves: i would say OK to close:

Tess: yes.

Dan: closes and leaves comment