こんにちは TAG-さん!

I'm requesting a TAG review of [feature name].

[One paragraph summary of idea, ideally copy-pasted from Explainer introduction]

• Explainer¹ (minimally containing user needs and example code): [url]
• User research: [url to public summary/results of research]
• Security and Privacy self-review²: [url]
• GitHub repo: [url]
• Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification):
  • [name] ([github username]), [organization/s] (repeat as necessary, we recommend including group chairs and editors in this list)
• Organization/project driving the design: [organization and/or project name]
• External status/issue trackers for this feature (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status):

Further details:

• I have reviewed the TAG's Web Platform Design Principles
• The group where the incubation/design work on this is being done (or is intended to be done in the future):
• The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done ("unknown" if not known):
• Existing major pieces of multi-implementer review or discussion of this design:
• Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this design:
• This work is being funded by:

You should also know that...

[please tell us anything you think is relevant to this review]

---

CAREFULLY READ AND DELETE CONTENT BELOW THIS LINE BEFORE SUBMITTING

Please preview the issue and check that the links work before submitting.

In particular:

• if anything links to a URL which requires authentication (e.g. Google document), please make sure anyone with the link can access the document. We would prefer public documents though, since we work in the open.

¹ For background, see our explanation of how to write a good explainer. We recommend the explainer to be in Markdown.

² Even for early-stage ideas, a Security and Privacy questionnaire helps us understand potential security and privacy issues and mitigations for your design, and can save us asking redundant questions. See https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/.