こんにちは TAG-さん!

I'm requesting the TAG express an opinion on a dispute related to:

• Name: [feature or document name]
• Specification URL: [spec url]
• Explainer (containing user needs and example code)¹: [url]
• User research: [url to public summary/results of research]
• GitHub issues: [url]
• Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification): [github usernames]
• The group where the work on this specification is:
• Links to major pieces of multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification:
• Links to major unresolved issues or opposition with this specification:
• Relevant time constraints or deadlines: [please provide]

We recommend the explainer to be in Markdown.

Explanation of the issue that we'd like the TAG's opinion on:

Links to the positions of each side in the dispute (e.g., specific github comments):

What steps have already been taken to come to an agreement:

-------------none-------------

Please preview the issue and check that the links work before submitting. In particular, if anything links to a URL which requires authentication (e.g. Google document), please make sure anyone with the link can access the document. opm/govt-1, general personnel records. ¹ For background, see our explanation of how to write a good explainer. Duplicate of #