#1060: Physical and logical resolution for screen-capture MediaStreamTracks
Discussions
Log in to see TAG-private discussions.
Discussed
Apr 14, 2025 (See Github)
Christian: Would be interested Hadley: Think @torgo is interested in Media as well Max: Would like to work on this as well
Discussed
May 5, 2025 (See Github)
Jeffrey: Christian commented; I think we're waiting for a reply now. Will mark as pending.
Discussed
May 19, 2025 (See Github)
Dan: Christian had some feedback, with a response. Since the feedback is from Christian, we should keep him involved. The explainer was updated, perhaps in response to the feedback.
Hadley: Christian has drafted a response.
Dan: I like this. I will respond with this.
Max: I agree.
we agree to close as satisfied - Christian to leave the closing comment
Discussed
May 19, 2025 (See Github)
Dan: Christian had some feedback, with a response. Since the feedback is from Christian, we should keep him involved. The explainer was updated, perhaps in response to the feedback.
Hadley: Christian has drafted a response.
Dan: I like this. I will respond with this.
Max: I agree.
we agree to close as satisfied - Christian to leave the closing comment
OpenedFeb 24, 2025
こんにちは TAG-さん!
I'm requesting an early TAG design review of "Physical and logical resolution for screen-capture MediaStreamTracks".
The idea is to expose the physical and logical resolution of a captured surface in MediaStreamTracks sourced from screen capture. The physical resolution is the size of the captured surface in pixels, and the logical resolution is the physical resolution divided by any scaling factor applied by the underlying operating system and/or the UA via page zoom.
Further details: