This issue was created because the 'horizontal review requested' label was added to § https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/564

This review is requested prior to the Advisory Committee Review.

New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.

Charter Review

Charter

diff from charter template

Expected end of charter refinement phase: unknown

If applicable:

diff from previous charter

chair dashboard

What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.

• New

• New WG
• New IG

• Existing

• Existing WG recharter
• Existing IG recharter

Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, security, and TAG. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.

Substantive changes

Short description (or link to it) of the substantive changes in this charter. Use "None or N/A" otherwise.

• Adding new module (specification) but within current scope
• (Still under investigation) Plan to bring modules to REC, while Core API remains living model in CR

Communities suggested for outreach

Known or potential areas of concern

Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...)

• charter-drafts repository with wg/iwwg

Anything else we should think about as we review?

• No CRS updated during current charter period yet.

Note: proposed chairs should be copied @... on this issue.

/cc @AdaRoseCannon @Yonet (co-chairs)

Note: The Technical Strategy Team Lead or Project & Process Team Lead will assign the issue to a Charter Facilitator for new charters. For rechartering, the team contact is the Charter Facilitator by default, please assign the issue to them directly.

Charter facilitator(s)

cc @himorin

<!-- Content below this is maintained by @w3c-tag-bot -->

---

Track conversations at https://tag-github-bot.w3.org/gh/w3ctag/design-reviews/1256