#1193: Other Spec Review: The revert-rule keyword
Discussions
Log in to see TAG-private discussions.
Discussed
Mar 16, 2026 (See Github)
Jeffrey: I've left a private comment that we should probably decline this as a detail the CSS WG does not need to check with us on. I also filed a bug (https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13510) that I read its spec and didn't see something I was looking for, but that wasn't a TAG comment. But I want to check all that with Xiaocheng. Anyone else have opinions? ...
OpenedFeb 12, 2026
Specification
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-cascade-5/#revert-rule-keyword
Explainer
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/blob/main/css-cascade-5/revert-rule-explainer.md
Links
The specification
Where and by whom is the work is being done?
Feedback so far
You should also know that...
No response
<!-- Content below this is maintained by @w3c-tag-bot -->Track conversations at https://tag-github-bot.w3.org/gh/w3ctag/design-reviews/1193