Jeffrey: WebTransport, Ehsan is already assigned. anyone else?

Yves: we already reviewed this 4 years ago.

Jeffrey: They made a summary of the changes since then... probably not much to say but will be good to have a second person in the review.

Ehsan assigned.

Ehsan: Posted my proposed comment, no one else assigned. How does it work?

Hadley: Is any TAG member expected to disagree with you?

Ehsan: Don’t think so… if others could have a look, that would be good.

Hadley: Editorial thoughts, we need to be very clear about what we want them to do. Hearing their thoughts? Requesting changes?

Ehsan: It’s mainly questions from me, I didn’t expect any actions. For the second one, that’s more like a recommendation for the future than something concrete expected from them. At least for now.

Hadley: Recommend you restructure your asks accordingly. Ending with "we look forward to hearing your thoughts." Any thoughts on the actual content?

… Another editorial thought, can you say "can you?" instead of "proponents." You can put your privacy concerns with connection stats and frame it as a question.

Ehsan: Good point. Can also directly post them as an issue.

Hadley: Let’s start with asking a question.

Ehsan: Ok. If anyone has a remark, please reach out to me. Overall, I think this seems fine.

Hadley: In terms of process, you should reach out to Yves.

Ehsan: Will do.

Hadley: As this is not a closing comment, I think you’re doing all the right things. You don’t need to get full consensus for that, as we’re still in exploring mode.

Ehsan: Ok, will get as many responses as possible, in a reasonable time.

(Later:)

Marcos: I may have a look, happy to read stuff.