#1215: [wg/wot] Web of Things Working Group rechartering
Discussions
Log in to see TAG-private discussions.
Discussed
Apr 6, 2026 (See Github)
Jeffrey: No progress yet.
Discussed
Apr 27, 2026 (See Github)
bump
Discussed
May 11, 2026 (See Github)
Jeffrey: Was concerned that WoT was having challenges. They are actually using URLs and the .well-known namespace and have provisions for accessing these over the Internet. Biggest concern is that they don't have a description of how they are re-using existing authentication protocols. Need to ask about that. They also don't describe coordination with oauth or any of the standard authentication systems mentioned. Beyond that, no obvious architectural concerns.
Heather: Authentication touches on my favorite things. I'm happy to let this progress but do want to comment on authentication things.
Jeffrey will draft a comment.
Comment by @jyasskin May 21, 2026 (See Github)
I've posted our comment to https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/509#issuecomment-4512908206.
OpenedApr 1, 2026
This issue was created because the 'horizontal review requested' label was added to § https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/509
This review is requested prior to the Advisory Committee Review.
Note: This is a placeholder issue for the WoT WG's rechartering process. The WoT WG Charter is expiring on 2 October 2025.
New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.
Charter Review
Draft Charter (WIP)
diff from charter template
Expected end of charter refinement phase: 2026-03-31
If applicable:
diff from previous charter
chair dashboard
What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.
Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, security, and TAG. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.
Communities suggested for outreach
Known or potential areas of concern
Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...)
Anything else we should think about as we review?
Note: proposed chairs should be copied @... on this issue.
Charter facilitator(s)
cc @draggett
<!-- Content below this is maintained by @w3c-tag-bot -->Track conversations at https://tag-github-bot.w3.org/gh/w3ctag/design-reviews/1215