#1118: [wg/webapps] Web Applications Working Group Charter
Discussions
Log in to see TAG-private discussions.
Discussed
Jul 7, 2025 (See Github)
Christian: I'm a participant of this WG, but happy with it. Only a small change, and it makes sense.
Hadley: No need for anyone else to look; maybe ask if you think others need to look at it.
Yves: Fine process-wise.
Christian to close the issue as satisfied.
Comment by @christianliebel Jul 10, 2025 (See Github)
This is a recharter of an existing, long-standing Working Group. The nature of the changes is mostly editorial. CSS adopted Intersection Observer, and Service Workers have transitioned from the now-closed Service Workers WG. The list of potential specs from WICG was updated. That being said, we are closing this review as satisfied.
We'd like to ask the chairs (@marcoscaceres, @LJWatson, @diekus, @mkruisselbrink, @sideshowbarker) to double-check Mike's name, as "Smiths" is likely a mistake and should be "Smith."
Thank you for all your hard work in keeping the web an amazing application platform!
Comment by @siusin Jul 10, 2025 (See Github)
Thank you! The typo has been corrected.
OpenedJul 2, 2025
This issue was created because the 'horizontal review requested' label was added to § https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/502
This review is requested prior to the Advisory Committee Review.
Charter Review
Charter
diff from charter template
If applicable:
diff from previous charter
chair dashboard
What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.
Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, security, and TAG. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.
Communities suggested for outreach
Known or potential areas of concern
The group would like to recharter to add Service Workers to the WG's list of deliverables #457
Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? Please send feedback to https://github.com/w3c/webappswg/issues/118
Anything else we should think about as we review?
@marcoscaceres @LJWatson @diekus @mkruisselbrink @sideshowbarker
Charter facilitator(s)
cc @sideshowbarker cc @siusin
<!-- Content below this is maintained by @w3c-tag-bot -->Track conversations at https://tag-github-bot.w3.org/gh/w3ctag/design-reviews/1118