Matthew: See my comments; if others have suggestions, please add. I will work more on this next week.

(Skipped.)

Matthew: Proposed the beginning of a comment. Need to verify how the video element works, will ask them tomorrow.

Matthew: Last time we talked about this, we discussed the basics of a proposed comment. I am still working on that and hope to finish that today.

Brian: Write up your comments; I probably shouldn't be writing it since it was submitted by someone from my org.

Luke: Because nothing within the video element is exposed, it's the video element that has focus as far as DOM elements is concerned. The controls within a video element are not specified; they are browser internal.

Matthew: I'll work up the base comment.

bump (Matthew to propose closing comment as discussed)

Matthew: I proposed a ocmment fot this. It really isn't perfect--it needs some copy editing (which I can easily do), and I wanted to try and get to a concern which is, "are we heading for a local maximum?" Is there a different condition that could apply more broadly? I listed this in the "gaps" issue #15. I wanted to tease something out about that from them. That said, overall, it clealry addresses good use cases. I ust think we can address evren more. So I'm interested in expansion. That's the view I failed to articulate in this draft comment. My draft has more specific bits of feedback. For the copy editoing, I can edit the comment directly. For the "local maximum" thing, I'll follow up later. Anyone who wants to review the comment: I'll be adding, not changing something that I've already written