#230: CSS ::part and ::theme pseudo elements
Discussions
2018-03-20
David: Feedback was given 1.5 months ago, then there was discussion on their side and corresponding changes, which I haven't looked at yet. Suggest we delay until next week.
ACTION: Revisit next week.
2018-03-27
David: We asked when the spec changes would be done - hopefully would happen next week so let's revisit during the F2F.
2018-05-22
@dbaron: Waiting on external feedback, might not be worth waiting for, maybe we should just close it.
@plinss: I am happy closing it, we can keep tabs on what is happening in the CSS WG.
OpenedFeb 6, 2018
こんにちはTAG!
I'm requesting a TAG review of:
こんにちはTAG!
I'm requesting a TAG review of:
You should also know that...
The spec is still in flux on some details The syntax for exposing parts from sub-components (especially for bulk-exposing) will probably change. There will probably be a separate theme= attribute for use with the ::theme() selector.
We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):
You should also know that...
The spec is still in flux. The syntax for exposing parts from sub-components (especially for bulk-exposing) will probably change. There will probably be a separate theme= attribute for use with the ::theme() selector.
Partial design doc for Blink: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eFekJxcNlkKHN2BwFwiwv6FoLrlRnuct_TGB2cKomW8/edit#
We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):