こんにちはTAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of:

• Name: CompressStream
• Specification URL: https://ricea.github.io/compression/ (final location TBD)
• Explainer (containing user needs and example code)¹: https://github.com/ricea/compressstream-explainer/blob/master/README.md
• GitHub issues (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/ricea/compressstream-explainer/issues
• Tests: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/compression
• Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification): CanonMukai (primary author), ricea (secondary author)

Further details:

• Relevant time constraints or deadlines: None at this time
• I have read and filled out the Self-Review Questionnare on Security and Privacy. The assessment is here.
• I have reviewed the TAG's API Design Principles
• The group where the work on this specification is:

We recommend the explainer to be in Markdown. On top of the usual information expected in the explainer, it is strongly recommended to add:

• Links to major pieces of multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification:
• Links to major unresolved issues or opposition with this specification:

You should also know that...

This proposal is still in the early stages.

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):

• open issues in our GitHub repo for each point of feedback
• open a single issue in our GitHub repo for the entire review
• leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify [github usernames]

---

Please preview the issue and check that the links work before submitting. In particular, if anything links to a URL which requires authentication (e.g. Google document), please make sure anyone with the link can access the document.

¹ For background, see our explanation of how to write a good explainer.