#550: WebXR Depth API
Discussions
2021-09-20
Dan: A response from Piotr... doesn't think it'd be controversial to add more text.. similar conversation around raw camera access, he's getting a lot of feedback about fingerprinting and privacy issues.. I want to say we'll review it when there's a PR
Rossen: yeah.. a lot of squishy language, UAs 'could'.. prefer to see more normative
Dan: yeah
Rossen: if this is a note that'd be fine. if this is a spec they need to work more on the language, but right direction
Dan: in your note about fingerprinting he did talk about the S&P questionnaire. I'm wondering if there's anything else we can point him to, unsactioned web tracking finding or something, that would underscore the issue. Great feedback that there needs to be more normative text.
Rossen: can leave a comment, schedule for next week. Outside of fuzzing, once this is done, we should consider closing it?
Dan: I think so.
OpenedAug 19, 2020
Saluton TAG!
I'm requesting a TAG review of WebXR Depth API.
As Augmented Reality becomes more common on the smartphone devices, new features are being introduced by the native APIs that enable AR-enabled experiences to access more detailed information about the environment in which the user is located. Depth API is one such feature, as it would allow authors of WebXR-powered experiences to obtain information about the distance from the user’s device to the real world geometry in the user’s environment.
Further details:
You should also know that...
N/A.
We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option):
🐛 open issues in our GitHub repo for each point of feedback