#279: Background fetch
Discussions
2018-11-28
Alex: ...
kenneth: Why couldn't this be the metadata to the map?
David: i don't understand why ... this design.
Alex: so sitemap.xxx for modules?
kenneth: Seems to be other things for metadata you might need for your modules.
Hadley: if there is a bottleneck ... explainer says - this is a problem, this is the solution. Does not explain why or what else was considered.
Alex: I think it's a good point. I will go back and talk to the requestor's manager.
David: I was also starting to write a comment - i'll add that.
kenneth: how would you ensure integrity? that would be nice to have in your module map.
David: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/213#issuecomment-44233519
2018-12-04
Kenneth: I am fine with this, Travis had a few comments, espacially about the name of downloadTotal. Waiting on Travis before closing the issue
2019-01-08
Travis: I read through the material and was ok with the responses on our open issues. Trusted UI - when you make a background fetch you provide info that can be displayed in the download manager - a string passed through to the UI. UAs should be careful about this... spammy or phishy messages, or deceptive ones, could be an issue.
Alex: could be non-normative text...
Travis: i'm looking for a note on the potential veunerability in the security & privacy section
Alex: makes sense.
Dan: +1
Peter: what's the issue?
Travis: yes i will open 1.
Peter: can we close this off?
Kenneth: I move to close it off.
Dan: +1
Kenneth: there are some remaining open issues but they are being tracked & i think it's fine.
Peter: closed
OpenedMay 2, 2018
Hello TAG!
I'm requesting a TAG review of:
You should also know that...
The spec isn't complete yet, so this is more of an opportunity to review the proposed API.
We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):