Saluton TAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of the WebXR Device API. We have previously requested review here and incorporated all the feedback; now that we are approaching CR I wanted to request review a second time in case the TAG wanted a chance to provide any final feedback.

The WebXR Device API provides access to input and output capabilities commonly associated with Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) devices. It allows you develop and host VR and AR experiences on the web.

• Explainer¹: https://github.com/immersive-web/webxr/blob/master/explainer.md
• Specification URL: https://immersive-web.github.io/webxr/
• Tests: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/webxr
• Security and Privacy self-review²: We have an explainer and a spec section on security and privacy.
• GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): github.com/immersive-web/webxr
• Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification):
  • @Manishearth (Editor, Mozilla)
  • @toji (Editor, Google)
  • @AdaRoseCannon (WG Chair, Samsung)
  • @cwilso (WG Chair, Google)
  • @yonet (WG Chair, Microsoft)
• Organization(s)/project(s) driving the specification: Immersive-Web Working Group
• Key pieces of existing multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: Previous TAG review at https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/403
• External status/issue trackers for this specification (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status): https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5680169905815552 , https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/WebXR_Device_API#Browser_compatibility , it's also released on some versions of Firefox Reality (which does not have its own status page)

Further details:

• I have reviewed the TAG's API Design Principles
• Relevant time constraints or deadlines: I'm hoping we can request CR in a month or so, so ideally before that, but I understand if the wide review process takes longer. Review is the main remaining CR blocker.
• The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: Immersive web Working Group
• Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification: Not that I know of
• This work is being funded by: ?

You should also know that...

[please tell us anything you think is relevant to this review]

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option):

☂️ open a single issue in our GitHub repo for the entire review