#641: Resource Timing
Discussions
Discussed
Jun 28, 2021 (See Github)
Ken: one is an update to an existing spec, do we have a list of changes?
Dan: we don't really have a list of things to review..
Comment by @torgo Jun 29, 2021 (See Github)
Hi @caribouW3 can you please give us a bit more context on this review - specifically you mention that there have been "recent additions" that would require a re-review but can you please be specific about what those additions are and what kind of feedback you're seeking from the TAG on these?
Comment by @caribouW3 Jun 29, 2021 (See Github)
Hi, Apart from some editorial work and minor tweaks, I suppose the most interesting part for this TAG review would be in section 4.5 Cross-Origin Resources.
Discussed
Aug 30, 2021 (See Github)
Sangwhan: looks good to me, the only change is
Dan: if these are minor deltas and we can simply close them lets do that
Sangwhan: I think we can close this one
Discussed
Sep 1, 2021 (See Github)
closed
Comment by @cynthia Sep 14, 2021 (See Github)
@kenchris and I discussed this today in our VF2F and we are happy with the changes. (Given that it is only 4.5 that changed) Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
OpenedJun 2, 2021
Ya ya yawm TAG!
I'm requesting a TAG review of Resource Timing.
This is actually a request to confirm or amend previous review, as requested in the CR transition https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/337#issuecomment-850633515
This specification was originally developed in levels, Level 1 has been a CR for a long time, Level 2 has had a wide review draft in 2017.
We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option):
🐛 open issues in our GitHub repo for each point of feedback
💬 leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify [github usernames]
Thank you!