#519: Behavior of the "disabled" attribute for HTMLLinkElement
Discussions
2020-06-15
Tess: I haven't looked at this.
David: I haven't looked either; I should do so!
Rossen / Tess: A few comments so far that haven't been answered.
David: Emilio is an author.
Sangwhan: Looks like this is all landed at WHATWG HTML already.
David: I suspect this is general interop improvement, but we should take a look given that we were asked.
Alice: Should the 3 of us schedule 15-20 minutes to look closer?
(will do
2020-07-20
David: Much smaller feature in an existing, interoperable spec.
... I replied to Emilio's comment, the status quo after the change in question seems like a reasonable compromise given the constraints.
... We should look at the specific issues Mason called attention to?
... I'm inclined to think we should close this issue... the reason things are ugly is compat, and people have tried to make it better and done what they could get away with compat-wise.
Peter: Propose closing, close at plenary?
David: sure
OpenedMay 29, 2020
Hello TAG!
I'm requesting a TAG review of the behavior of the "disabled" attribute for HTMLLinkElement.
This request is being made at the suggestion of @slightlyoff in this Intent to Ship thread. This change is an interop-improvement, as the "disabled" attribute was previously poorly specified, and implementations differed. There is a more general need to specify the "disabled" attribute for HTMLStyleElement and SVGStyleElement, and this is discussed here and here. Perhaps the TAG could weigh in on either the HTMLLinkElement specifically, or these issues generally?
Further details:
We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option):
💬 leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify @mfreed7, @emilio