#407: More restrictive hasEnrolledInstrument() for autofill data

Visit on Github.

Opened Aug 13, 2019

こんにちはTAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of:

Further details:

  • Relevant time constraints or deadlines: Please review before September.
  • Self-Review Questionnaire on Security and Privacy is not applicable, since this is a behavior change to a part of an existing API.
  • I have reviewed the TAG's API Design Principles, although it does not seem to be applicable here either.
  • The group where the work on this specification is: Web Payments Working Group.

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):

  • Leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify @rsolomakhin

Discussions

2019-09-04

Minutes

Peter: Waiting for feedback?

David: yeah it woudl be good to get an answer to the question I asked

2020-03-16

Minutes

Tess: not much has changed - the request is for a behaviour change. Most recent update is that they will add non-normative text to explain. That sounds fine to me. I think we can close it.

David: it's a pretty small change

Tess: we could post a comment asking for an update...

David: yeah

Dan: yea