#744: Collection of Screensharing-related UX Hints

Visit on Github.

Opened Jun 2, 2022

Ma ha'matzav TAG?!

I'm requesting a TAG review of a collection of UX hints related to screensharing. They are too far apart to be described together, but close enough that they can be reviewed as a group - as suggested by @chrishtr on this thread.

Further details:

  • I have reviewed the TAG's Web Platform Design Principles
  • Relevant time constraints or deadlines: N/A
  • The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: W3C WebRTC Working Group
  • Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification: N/A
  • This work is being funded by: Google

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as: 💬 leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify @eladalon1983

Discussions

2022-06-27

Minutes

Max leaving feedback re explainer format and multi-stakeholder. Overall looks ok.

2022-07-18

Minutes

Max: waiting for answers... Will email Elad.

2023-01-09

Minutes

Dan: it's a bunch of different things

Rossen: how do we review many things.... Looks like they have at least five different APIs all under one review.

Dan: as Elad said, he feels like they're too far apart to be part of the same explainer, but close enough for review as a group, because they're all screensharing related UX hints. Looking at display media stream... There are security considerations, a description of the use case

Rossen: hard to tell what it is from the explainer. What is being proposed?

Dan: a spec change, which is a PR that has already been merged, into media screenshare ... They've all been merged. I would like to ask what they're asking us for. Are there issues with this? Privacy and security it says covered by existing questionnaire - small delta.

Rossen: looking at this .. says it would benefit from a joint explainer. Combined outline with pros and cons, what's in and out of scope.

Amy: there's back and forth in that thread that says one overall explainer might be confusing, so maybe that wouldn't help us?

Rossen: [will respond asking how we should approach review and asking for one explainer]