#401: Default accessibility semantics for custom elements

Visit on Github.

Opened Aug 7, 2019

こんにちはTAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of:

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):

  • open issues in our GitHub repo for each point of feedback
  • open a single issue in our GitHub repo for the entire review
  • leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify one of the primary contacts above

Please preview the issue and check that the links work before submitting. In particular, if anything links to a URL which requires authentication (e.g. Google document), please make sure anyone with the link can access the document.

¹ For background, see our explanation of how to write a good explainer.

Discussions

Comment by @slightlyoff Oct 31, 2019 (See Github)

Just wanted to flag that Blink is likely to ship this, in part, because this review was opened in August but hasn't seen forward movement since then. Speak now or hold your peace!

Comment by @alice Oct 31, 2019 (See Github)

(Also note that this was touched on in the previous review of AOM.)

Comment by @torgo Nov 5, 2019 (See Github)

Discussed briefly on our call today and the consensus was to close with positive feedback.