こんにちは TAG-さん!

I'm requesting a TAG review of CSS shape() function.

{{One paragraph summary of the feature, ideally copy-pasted from your Explainer.}}

• Explainer¹: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-shapes-2/#shape-function
• Specification: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-shapes-2/#shape-function
• WPT Tests: https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-masking/clip-path?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=shape%28 https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-shapes?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=shape%28
• User research:
• Security and Privacy self-review²: https://gist.github.com/noamr/6897ab8bddbcc6189cd39761f60d48f2
• GitHub repo: w3c/csswg-drafts
• Primary contacts:
  • @noamr, Google Inc, developing and editing the spec
• Organization/project driving the specification: Google, Apple
• Multi-stakeholder support³:
  • Chromium comments: Chromium is actively implementing this.
  • WebKit comments: WebKit is actively implementing this. https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238371
  • Mozilla comments: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1153
  • {{...include feedback/review from developers, implementers, civil society, and others}}
• Status/issue trackers for implementations⁴: https://g-issues.chromium.org/issues/40829059 https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238371

Further details:

• I have reviewed the TAG's Web Platform Design Principles
• Relevant time constraints or deadlines: This is already enabled by default in chromium and webkit.
• The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: CSS
• The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done (if different from the current group):
• Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification: None
• This work is being funded by: Google

You should also know that... There is an open issue to bring more CSS-like capabilities to path, in a way that stays closer to SVG.