#325: WebRTC DSCP Control API
Discussions
Comment by @alvestrand Nov 15, 2018 (See Github)
tagging @thaloun
Comment by @torgo Feb 5, 2019 (See Github)
Thanks for this. Can you please write an explainer (see https://w3ctag.github.io/explainers) about this so we can properly evaluate?
Comment by @slightlyoff Feb 5, 2019 (See Github)
@alvestrand: we quickly discussed today and there's a question about what problem this solves. An explainer would go a long way, as would example code. Without some motivation and context, it's hard to understand what this feature is for, who it helps, and what risks we run.
Comment by @cynthia Feb 5, 2019 (See Github)
DSCP isn't disambiguated anywhere in the spec, which I think should be considered a bug. (At least I have not a slight clue what that is.)
Comment by @cynthia Sep 10, 2019 (See Github)
We don't quite know what to do with this issue, and it's been dangling for quite a bit. We'll close it for now as - happy to discuss this in person next week during TPAC if still needs our input.
Comment by @dontcallmedom Oct 30, 2019 (See Github)
There is an explainer for the spec https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-dscp-exp/blob/master/explainer.md (sorry this wasn't pointed out earlier)
OpenedNov 15, 2018
こんにちはTAG!
I'm requesting a TAG review of:
Further details (optional):
You should also know that this is a minor control surface added to the WebRTC spec to split up an existing feature (priority) into two independent components (local prioritization and DSCP codepoint usage) without making changes to already-agreed documents.
We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):