#307: FetchEvent.resultingClientId
Discussions
Discussed
Jun 19, 2019 (See Github)
Dan: needs eplainer.. been sitting around for a while.
Sangwhan: needs new assignees.
Discussed
Jun 26, 2019 (See Github)
Sangwhan: we need to close this as well as we haven't provided feedback and it has shipped in the meanwhile.
Peter: "overtaken by events"
Peter: how many implementations?
Sangwhan: as of today it's 2.
[conesnsus to close
Comment by @cynthia Jun 26, 2019 (See Github)
Discussed during today's teleconference. We apologize that this took so long.
We've decided that we dragged on this for way too long, and any feedback at this point would be a bit too late. (already shipping in two implementations) So we are closing this. Thank you so much for the patience.
(If this happens again, please bump the thread and make us aware!)
OpenedOct 1, 2018
Bonjour TAG,
I'm requesting a TAG review of:
Name: FetchEvent.resultingClientId
Specification URL: https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#fetch-event-resultingclientid
Explainer, Requirements Doc, or Example code: There's some discussion at https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1091 and https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1245.
Tests: service-workers/service-worker/navigation-redirect.https.html
Primary contacts: @mattto @jungkees @jakearchibald
Further details (optional):
You should also know that...
There is a related
replacesClientId
attribute specified, which I am not planning to implement in Chrome for now because there has been no clear developer demand.We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):