#255: HTML General Review: HTML Option Lists
Discussions
Comment by @torgo Jul 26, 2018 (See Github)
From Seattle f2f discussion - regarding <datalist>
, can this be made more extensible to enable people building their own custom controls to extend this functionality rather than rolling their own? This could be true of the other controls listed.
Comment by @hober Dec 10, 2019 (See Github)
Given we'll be doing an annual horizontal review of HTML, I propose forward-duping this to #449 & closing.
OpenedApr 17, 2018
Hello TAGļ¼
This issue is part of the TAG's larger effort to review the HTML spec in its entirety--please see the original issue https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/174 for a summary of all the break-out issues.
The "Sections" are all the sections of the WHATWG HTML spec that should be reviewed as part of this issue. Where the spec section has associated Web Platform Tests, the specific WPT path is noted. While the primary focus of the review is the specification text, it can be helpful to review the related tests to help clarify algorithms or see interoperability conformance issues (or find issues with the tests).
The "Features" are just a sample of what you will encounter as part of this spec section, it's not meant to be exhaustive.
Here are some example suggestions for what to look for during the review, but don't limit to only these suggestions!
<select>
<datalist>
<optgroup>
<option>
Please provide feedback as (please select one):